However, the paper offers guidance for other researcher development initiatives, especially in contexts where the field is not well established.ĭeliberately designed practices, such as including a broad range of researchers and creating a safe space for active engagement in developmental activities, can have a positive impact on participant’s researcher identities, self-confidence and sense of belonging. The analyses and recommendations arising from the BREC experience are context-specific and therefore cannot be generalised. Although transformation of the field is a long-term process, this process can start with small intentional practices. Introducing researcher development programs requires careful consideration of the social, institutional and practical contexts in which it takes place. The paper takes a reflection-on-action approach, reflecting on experience and sharing the lessons learned. Although the immediate focus is on graduate students, the intention is to trigger wider discussions of researcher development theory in the context of policy and practice in the region. This paper aims to share reflections on a collaborative researcher development initiative in Malaysia – the Borneo Research Education Conference (BREC) series.
#Those who remain script 2019 september free
⏵ Free online access to 50 users: Eprint link Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 259-273. Researcher development in Malaysia: A reflection-on-action. Appreciating how research practice may be guided, moulded, or even transformed in response to personal and social values was the main focus of this seminar.Ī recent article co-authored with two collaborators, in which we critically review our use of a variety of intentional practices for researcher development in Malaysia:Īit Saadi, I., Collins, H.
#Those who remain script 2019 september professional
Such innovations in research appear to be proliferating in a variety of professional fields. Yet, the tools and procedures of research, adapted and used innovatively, seem to be effective for channelling individual contributions towards locally valuable outcomes. As the practice of research expands to ever new domains, researchers are confronted with tasks for which the craft of research was not designed originally. Therefore, in addition to contributing to larger purposes, researchers need to get accustomed to the idea of responsible conduct. Naturally, certain principles of honesty, fairness, transparency, responsibility, and justice must apply to research as much as these apply to other human activities. As a human endeavour, the activity of researchers impinge upon the lives of other human beings. Researchers ought to become aware of the particular values and expectations guiding their work, so that they may exercise their individual agency while contributing to larger purposes. Typically, personal, institutional, and social values influence the choice of research topics and methods. As borne out by insider accounts of research, uncertainties and ambiguities encountered in the everyday practice of research require researchers to make choices, which are guided as much by objectivity and logic as also by the subjective assessment of researchers.
Researchers work at the boundary between confusion and clarity, scarcely knowing for sure which is which.
The title of my talk was: Responding to Values Through Research Practice. I was a panel speaker at the doctoral colloquium, arranged by the S P Jain Institute of Management and Research (SPJIMR), Mumbai, India, on, as part of the 8th PMRE Asia Forum ( PMRE stands for Principles for Responsible Management Education, a UN-supported initiative).
0 kommentar(er)
